Fran O'Sullivan: NZ Seeks US Ties Amid AUKUS
The recent AUKUS agreement, a trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, has sparked discussions about New Zealand's future role in the Indo-Pacific region. In a recent column for the New Zealand Herald, Fran O'Sullivan, a prominent columnist and business commentator, argues that New Zealand must deepen its ties with the US in light of this new geopolitical landscape.
O'Sullivan acknowledges the historical and ongoing tensions between New Zealand and the US, particularly regarding nuclear weapons. New Zealand's staunch anti-nuclear stance, enshrined in its nuclear-free policy, has often put it at odds with US foreign policy. However, she contends that the current security environment, marked by growing Chinese assertiveness and regional instability, necessitates a reassessment of New Zealand's foreign policy.
AUKUS: A Turning Point for the Region
O'Sullivan argues that AUKUS is a clear sign that the US is pivoting towards the Indo-Pacific region, seeking to strengthen its alliances and bolster its military presence in the area. This shift, she says, has significant implications for New Zealand, which has traditionally relied on its ANZUS alliance with Australia and the US for security guarantees.
With AUKUS, the US is effectively circumventing New Zealand's nuclear-free policy by supplying Australia with nuclear-powered submarines. This raises questions about New Zealand's ability to remain relevant and secure within the evolving security architecture of the Indo-Pacific.
The Need for a New Approach
O'Sullivan argues that New Zealand needs to adapt its foreign policy to the changing times. She suggests that deepening its ties with the US, particularly in areas like defense, intelligence sharing, and economic cooperation, would be beneficial. This engagement, she argues, could help New Zealand better protect its interests and contribute to a stable and prosperous region.
While acknowledging the challenges posed by its nuclear-free policy, O'Sullivan suggests that New Zealand could explore alternative solutions, such as focusing on partnerships in areas that do not directly involve nuclear weapons. She emphasizes the need for constructive dialogue and cooperation to find common ground and build stronger relationships.
Conclusion
Fran O'Sullivan's column offers a thought-provoking analysis of New Zealand's current foreign policy dilemma. She argues that the country must rethink its approach to security and embrace a more proactive and collaborative engagement with its key allies, particularly the United States. The AUKUS agreement has highlighted the need for New Zealand to adapt to the changing dynamics of the Indo-Pacific region and ensure its continued security and prosperity.
