Fantasy Football: Akers or Mattison After Mixon Injury?
The injury to Joe Mixon has shaken up the fantasy football landscape, leaving many scrambling to find a replacement at running back. With Mixon out for an extended period, the question on everyone's mind is: should you snag Cam Akers or Dalvin Cook's backup, Alexander Mattison?
Both players present intriguing options, but ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific fantasy league format and your roster's needs. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to help you make an informed decision.
Cam Akers: The Rams' Workhorse
Strengths:
- Increased Workload: Akers is now the clear lead back in the Rams' offense, and with the team's commitment to a run-first approach, he's poised for significant touches.
- Pass-Catching Potential: Akers has shown the ability to contribute in the passing game, making him a valuable asset in PPR leagues.
- Potential for a Big Game: The Rams' offense, though not explosive this season, has the potential to break out, especially with Akers as the focal point.
Weaknesses:
- Uncertain Offensive Landscape: The Rams' offense is still trying to find its rhythm, and their overall production is a concern.
- Competition from Kyren Williams: While Akers is the clear starter, Williams remains a factor in the backfield and could eat into his touches.
- Matchup-Dependent: Akers' success will be dependent on the Rams' offensive line's ability to open holes and the quality of the opponent's defense.
Alexander Mattison: The Reliable Backup
Strengths:
- Proven Production: Mattison has consistently shown the ability to produce when given the opportunity, filling in admirably for Cook in the past.
- Solid Workhorse Potential: With Cook out, Mattison will be the Vikings' primary back, inheriting a substantial workload.
- Strong Offensive Line: The Vikings boast a strong offensive line that will help Mattison find running lanes.
Weaknesses:
- Limited Pass Game Involvement: Mattison is primarily a power runner and doesn't offer much in the passing game.
- Competition from Kene Nwangwu: Nwangwu could see a slight increase in touches, reducing Mattison's overall workload.
- Potential for Regression: Mattison's production could decline if he doesn't receive the volume of touches he enjoyed in the past.
The Verdict: It's a Close Call
Both Akers and Mattison offer fantasy value, but it's a close call. If you're in a PPR league, Akers' pass-catching ability gives him the edge. His upside is higher, but his floor is lower.
If you prefer a more consistent option with a guaranteed workload, Mattison is the safer pick. He's a reliable workhorse with a strong offensive line to support him.
Ultimately, the best choice for you will depend on your league's format, roster composition, and risk tolerance. Consider your current situation and make the decision that best suits your team's needs.
Don't forget to keep an eye on both players' performance in the coming weeks! This could give you a clearer picture of their potential for the rest of the season.
